Thursday, July 8, 2010
Tuesday, June 22, 2010
week 6 - Alachua County
This was pretty straightforward, though it took me forever to get ArcMap to quite freezing up every time I tried to edit the data properties.
I enjoyed playing with the 4 part map. I didn't begin to have any issues until the weighted overlay maps. Those I could not seem to get to work right no matter how I played with it. I posted what I managed to do. I could interpret the data and could see by the shaded areas of each of the issues versus the location of the places that it would be an either or type of deal. The areas with the higher home values and older populations were much farther from UF and NFRMC. They would have to determine which set of standards were more important.
Wednesday, June 2, 2010
Process Summary – Module 4: Hurricane Katrina
Dawn Weaver
- Explored the data. Everything seemed to be pretty straightforward and easy to find. I did have some issues with the metadata charts. The attribute values and resolution for rasters was confusing.
- Set the environments – I figured this one out! The step by step instructions were very clear.
- Produced the first map – got all the way through it, saved it and had to start over because it saved a blank map…though the file name was correct, there was nothing in it.
- Continued to follow the steps, though this would be so much easier ans less stressful if the remote servers were faster….everything kept freezing up and I kept having to restart ARCMap, losing whatever I did since the last save. This was on RS 1 & 2.
- I got to number 6 on step 8 before I got confused. I still can’t figure out what they were talking about in the “hint” section.
- The final issue I had was the final deliverable. I could not figure out how to save the attribute table to make it a deliverable. So I just created a map for each, acreage and square miles.
Wednesday, April 28, 2010
Monday, March 22, 2010
I got lost about the time Multipart of Singlepart came into play. So, I am really not sure of the answers to the questions.
1) I tried a bunch of tools and couldn't get snything that looked similar
2) I just used the conservation layer on top without any transparency...that blocked out the sites you couldn't use, leaving the potential sites visible
3) since I got lost and really didn't understand this, I knew if I got any results from this question, it wouldn't be accurate
Tuesday, March 16, 2010
spring break lab
Friday, March 5, 2010
week 7
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)